Home arrow Credit Issues arrow In The News arrow CFPB Backs Down on Credit Card Fee Caps in Wake of Court Decision
User Login





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Guard My Credit Menu
Home
- - - THE ISSUES - - -
Videos
Fraud and Scams
Credit Issues
Identity Theft
Privacy Issues
Our Children
Politics & Politicians
- - ACTION CENTER - -
Guard My Credit Links
Helpful Pamphlets
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
About ACCESS
Contact Us
About Our Site
Join the Fight
ACCESS is a non-profit, tax exempt consumer advocacy group.

Donations are tax deductable.

Guard My Credit Hits
11451616 Visitors
CFPB Backs Down on Credit Card Fee Caps in Wake of Court Decision PDF Print E-mail

April 13, 2012 - The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is backing down on certain fee caps it attempted to impost on banks issuing credit cards to subprime borrowers. The agency had tried to limit all fees associated subprime credit cards to 25% of the credit limit in the first year after issuance. Included in those rules were application and activation fees. But a court in South Dakota issued a restraining order preventing the agency from putting those fee caps into effect. Now the agency has issued new rules which don't include fees charged prior to activation of the card.

Image

The CFPB acknowledges that the new rule will be less beneficial to borrowers. But the agency had little choice given the decision of the court. When the agency attempted to implement their original rule, they were sued by a bank claiming that the CFPB and the FED had overstepped their authority. The court agreed.

Under the newly proposed rule, card issues will be able to charge any amount they want to review a card application and for activation. Once the card issued and has been activated, bank fees would be limited to 25% of the credit limit of the card for the first year.

The new rules are currently slated to go into effect in the second half of this year. Until then, banks can continue to charge any fees that they deem appropriate. 

Note: When posting a comment, please sign-in first if you want a response. If you are not registered, click here. Registration is easy and free.

Follow me on Twitter:

 

TwitterCounter for @jmalmberg

 

Follow ACCESS

Comments
Search
Merchant Account  - Manager     |From:128.127.106.xxx |2012-04-17 17:55:28
The reason sub-prime consumers are faced with higher cost of borrowing than their higher-score counterparts is that they have mismanaged some of their previous loans. It is certainly true that people can and do fall on hard times, which can easily lead to late payments and defaults. However, in such cases the lenders take a hit in the form of a write-off. So is it then really "unfair" to subsequently categorize such borrowers as higher risk and price their loans accordingly? No, I don't think it is.
jmalmberg  - Re: Merchant Account     |2012-04-17 18:53:31
We didn't take a side in this story. We simply said what the CFPB was doing.

That said, there is no doubt that people need a means to reestablish credit after going through a hard time. But this type of credit card is often given to people before they are really financially able to go through that process. Instead, they dig an even deeper ditch that is nearly impossible to get out of.

Unlimited fees up front, plus 25% of the cards limit in fees over the course of the first year, plus interest on the balance on the card is what you seem to be advocating for. And you are taking that position with people that already have financial difficulties. No wonder that these cards have a high default rate.

It should be pointed out here that these cards would be illegal if the states were able to enforce their usury laws. There is a good reason for that.
Cathy  - Sub-prime   |From:207.224.111.xxx |2012-04-18 17:56:59
The problem with the sub-prime lending is so numerous; first, these are usually individual with little credit experience and their first experience is at usury rate? That is fair? Second, sub-prime was created so that banks could make loans to high risk applicants and thereby abide with federal regulations (CRA) - two wrongs don't make a right. Third, credit scores had been around over a 100 years prior to automation, all - without exception - had been rejected cause they never worked. Now, we place these algorithms behind a black box and presto, chango, they work? Don't believe it.

Over the years, I have personally known many people who could well afford additional credit, but their point score was low so they wanted to class them as sub-prime. Thankfully, they were educated enough to go somewhere else. Then there are the people who could ill-afford credit being barraged with credit card offers, in a crazy marketing desire to bury them in debt, because their scores were high. Humm.. yeah, that makes sense, give credit to those that can't afford it & not to those that can? How long will that work? Oh, I guess we just found that out with the mortgage meltdown.

Last but not least, usurious interest rates benefit no one. In 1970, when the US Supreme Court decided whether interest rates can be transported across state lines, violating states rights, they stated that the only group who can fix this problem is Congress. And what do we hear from them? **crickets**
Only registered users can write comments!

3.25 Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 
Guard My Credit Polls
#1 - Why did you visit our site today?
 
.•*´¯☼ ♥ ♥ Your Support of These Links Is GREATLY Appreciated ♥ ♥ ☼¯´*•.
Advertisement
 
Go to top of page
Home | Contact Us |About Us | Privacy Policy
eXTReMe Tracker
12/22/2024 01:54:20