Home arrow Credit Issues arrow In The News arrow Court Ruling Likely to Result in More Voice Mail Messages from Debt Collectors
User Login





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Guard My Credit Menu
Home
- - - THE ISSUES - - -
Videos
Fraud and Scams
Credit Issues
Identity Theft
Privacy Issues
Our Children
Politics & Politicians
- - ACTION CENTER - -
Guard My Credit Links
Helpful Pamphlets
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
About ACCESS
Contact Us
About Our Site
Join the Fight
ACCESS is a non-profit, tax exempt consumer advocacy group.

Donations are tax deductable.

Guard My Credit Hits
11412400 Visitors
Court Ruling Likely to Result in More Voice Mail Messages from Debt Collectors PDF Print E-mail

May 15, 2012 - Because of wording in the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) that restricts who debt collectors can communicate with regarding unpaid debts, debt collectors have been reluctant to leave voice mail messages when unable to reach people they are trying to collect from. Until now, collectors could get into real trouble for violating the FDCPA if someone other than the actual debtor listened to the voice mail message. But a recent federal court ruling out of Minnesota now provides some guidance to debt collectors that is likely to change the way they act when an answering machine picks up their calls. 

Image

In the case known as Zortman v. J.C. Christensen & Associates, Inc., Christina Zortman had received a call from a collection agency on her cell phone. When she didn't pick up, the call went to her voice mail. The caller left a message that said he had an "important message" for Zortman. He identified himself as a debt collector and left a return phone number.

Zortman claimed that she had lent her cellular phone to her children and that one of them retrieved the message. She sued the collection agency claiming that the message was a "communication" under the FDCPA and because it had been picked up by someone other than her, the collection agency had violated the portion of the law prohibiting third party communication.

The court disagreed.

The ruling from the court specifically stated that the term "important message" didn't describe the nature of the call. Simply because the call originated from a collection agency didn't mean that the agency was attempting to collect a debt. Nor did it mean that Zortman was the target of a collection agency action simply because she was receiving a call.

In fact, the judge stated that the information contained in the message revealed little more than what anyone could discover in a "missed call log" had the agency not left a message in the first place.

As a practical matter, this ruling is likely to mean that people who do receive calls from debt collectors will start seeing their voice mail boxes fill up with messages from them. Consumers who want to put a stop to this will have to notify the collection agency that they no longer want to communicate with them. To do this, consumers should put their request in writing and send it via certified mail with a return receipt required.

While debt collectors are required to honor requests to cut off communication under the FDCPA, making such a request will not stop them from pursuing other collection methods. Nor will it stop them from suing debtors.

Note: When posting a comment, please sign-in first if you want a response. If you are not registered, click here. Registration is easy and free.

Follow me on Twitter:

 

TwitterCounter for @jmalmberg

 

Follow ACCESS

 

 

Comments
Search
MB34  - What about fraudulent Caller-IDs   |From:71.41.16.xxx |2012-05-31 15:07:39
What can we do about debt collectors that either modify their caller-id info or do not transmit it at all?
jmalmberg  - RE: What about fraudulent Caller-IDs     |2012-05-31 15:54:25
What you are talking about is phone "spoofing" and it is illegal under federal law. The penalties are up to $10,000 per violation. There can also be criminal penalties.

The law has been in effect since December, 2010. I'm not sure who you report violations to but I would start with your State Attorney General, the FTC and the Secret Service (they are the primary law enforcement agency for telecommunications crimes).

In addition to the violations involving spoofing, there are both federal and state laws that require debt collectors to identify themselves and why they are calling. Spoofing the caller ID may be a violation of these laws as debt collection laws do not allow them to lie.
Only registered users can write comments!

3.25 Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 
Guard My Credit Polls
#1 - Why did you visit our site today?
 
.•*´¯☼ ♥ ♥ Your Support of These Links Is GREATLY Appreciated ♥ ♥ ☼¯´*•.
Advertisement
 
Go to top of page
Home | Contact Us |About Us | Privacy Policy
eXTReMe Tracker
11/21/2024 04:22:15