Home arrow Credit Issues arrow In The News arrow KlearGear.com Not The Only Retailer Willing To Fine Customers Over Bad Online Reviews
User Login





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Guard My Credit Menu
Home
- - - THE ISSUES - - -
Videos
Fraud and Scams
Credit Issues
Identity Theft
Privacy Issues
Our Children
Politics & Politicians
- - ACTION CENTER - -
Guard My Credit Links
Helpful Pamphlets
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
About ACCESS
Contact Us
About Our Site
Join the Fight
ACCESS is a non-profit, tax exempt consumer advocacy group.

Donations are tax deductable.

Guard My Credit Hits
11412504 Visitors
KlearGear.com Not The Only Retailer Willing To Fine Customers Over Bad Online Reviews PDF Print E-mail

December 26, 2013 - Last week, we told you about case of online retailer KlearGear.com. The company attempted to fine one of its customers $3,500 for a bad online review which was posted on RipoffReport.com. When the customer refused to pay the fine, the company hired a collection agency which subsequently reported the fine as a bad debt on customer's credit report. Attorneys are now involved in the case but, according to a report from CNN, KlearGear isn't the only company using this tactic.

Image

In the KlearGear case, the company included something called a non-disparagement clause in its online terms of service. This type of clause is quite common in many types of contracts. For instance, companies often include language which prohibits non-disparagement in employee contracts. Simply put, by signing the contract you may be giving up your First Amendment right to criticize your employer at a later date.

But non-disparagement clauses in retail agreements are not at all common. At least, they have not been common to this point. It is highly unlikely that any such clause would withstand court scrutiny in a lawsuit even if the parties actually signed such an agreement the old fashioned way… with pen and ink. Such a clause simply doesn't serve the public interest. Including such a clause in a website's terms of service makes it even more likely that a court will uphold it.

With that said, when you make a retail purchase, the last thing that you are probably thinking about is having to sue the retailer to protect your credit. Nobody wants to go through something like that.

According to the CNN report though, more companies are including this type of non-disparagement language in their terms of service. If correct, we can expect to see the increased necessity for similar lawsuits in the future.

Bottom line is that consumers need to be reading the fine print in online agreements. We don't anticipate that large retailers will include this type of language in their agreements because the risk of public backlash is just too high. But small retailers may be tempted. The old adage, "buyer beware," applies. You'll find the CNN report below.

byJim Malmberg

Note: When posting a comment, please sign-in first if you want a response. If you are not registered, click here. Registration is easy and free.

Follow me on Twitter:

 

TwitterCounter for @jmalmberg

 

Follow ACCESS
 

 

Comments
Search
Only registered users can write comments!

3.25 Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 
Guard My Credit Polls
#1 - Why did you visit our site today?
 
.•*´¯☼ ♥ ♥ Your Support of These Links Is GREATLY Appreciated ♥ ♥ ☼¯´*•.
Advertisement
 
Go to top of page
Home | Contact Us |About Us | Privacy Policy
eXTReMe Tracker
11/21/2024 05:05:34