Home arrow Credit Issues arrow In The News arrow SCOTUS Ruling Means Dishonest Debtors Can Discharge Their Debts in Bankruptcy
User Login





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Guard My Credit Menu
Home
- - - THE ISSUES - - -
Videos
Fraud and Scams
Credit Issues
Identity Theft
Privacy Issues
Our Children
Politics & Politicians
- - ACTION CENTER - -
Guard My Credit Links
Helpful Pamphlets
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
About ACCESS
Contact Us
About Our Site
Join the Fight
ACCESS is a non-profit, tax exempt consumer advocacy group.

Donations are tax deductable.

Guard My Credit Hits
11412422 Visitors
SCOTUS Ruling Means Dishonest Debtors Can Discharge Their Debts in Bankruptcy PDF Print E-mail

June 5, 2018 - Can a debtor lie to get access to credit and then use bankruptcy proceedings to have that debt thrown out? That was the question argued before the Supreme Court in November. And this week we got our answer. In a unanimous ruling the justices said that unless the lie was in writing, the answer is "yes."

Image Image

The ruling in Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. Appling is a warning to any company that extends credit to its clients. Any agreement extending credit must be in written form if the creditor wants to protect themself from financial losses due to a bankruptcy filing.

Here is the case in a nutshell. Lamar, Archer & Cofrin is a law firm that represented R. Scott Appling in a legal matter. Over the course of time, Appling fell behind on his legal payments and the law firm threatened to end its representation. To prevent this, Appling orally informed the firm that he was expecting a tax refund of $100,000. That would have been more than enough to cover his entire outstanding legal bill. Based on that statement, the law firm said that it would continue to represent Appling. But nothing was put in writing and eventually became clear that Appling had no intention of paying his debt. So the law firm filed suit against him. Shortly after that, Appling filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection.

US bankruptcy law specifically exempts certain debts from bankruptcy protection if the debts were incurred due to "false pretenses, a false representation, or actual fraud other than a statement respecting the debtor’s … financial condition." But the justices found that an oral statement about a tax return could reasonably be considered "a statement respecting the debtor's financial condition," and therefore bankruptcy protections did apply. Had the firm received a written statement about the tax return, which could have been considered a "false representation," the firm likely would have been protected.

The moral of the story here is that if you run a business and you rely on oral statements from your customers to extend them credit, you could wind up holding the bag if your customers ever file for bankruptcy. All credit agreements need to be in writing. 

byJim Malmberg

Note: When posting a comment, please sign-in first if you want a response. If you are not registered, click here. Registration is easy and free.

Follow me on Twitter:

Jim Malmberg has 8112 followers on Twitter

 

Follow ACCESS
Comments
Search
Only registered users can write comments!

3.25 Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 
Guard My Credit Polls
#1 - Why did you visit our site today?
 
.•*´¯☼ ♥ ♥ Your Support of These Links Is GREATLY Appreciated ♥ ♥ ☼¯´*•.
Advertisement
 
Go to top of page
Home | Contact Us |About Us | Privacy Policy
eXTReMe Tracker
11/21/2024 04:30:32