Home arrow Credit Issues arrow In The News arrow Supreme Court Says Credit Repair Companies Can Force Consumers Into Binding Arbitration
User Login





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Guard My Credit Menu
Home
- - - THE ISSUES - - -
Videos
Fraud and Scams
Credit Issues
Identity Theft
Privacy Issues
Our Children
Politics & Politicians
- - ACTION CENTER - -
Guard My Credit Links
Helpful Pamphlets
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
About ACCESS
Contact Us
About Our Site
Join the Fight
ACCESS is a non-profit, tax exempt consumer advocacy group.

Donations are tax deductable.

Guard My Credit Hits
11412534 Visitors
Supreme Court Says Credit Repair Companies Can Force Consumers Into Binding Arbitration PDF Print E-mail

January 10, 2012 - In an 8 to 1 ruling, the US Supreme Court handed down a decision today that says that credit repair companies can force consumers who are unhappy with their results to engage in binding arbitration rather than litigation. The ruling will make it much more difficult for consumers seeking legal remedies against any companies they may hire to help them restore their credit. 

Image

The particular case in question revolved around language in the Credit Repair Organization Act that gives consumers a right to sue. That language didn't distinguish between court litigation and binding arbitration. Because of this lack of specificity in the law, the court ruled that there was nothing to prevent credit repair companies from requiring their clients to use binding arbitration to settle any disputes.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs in the case had argued that Congress had never intended to allow credit repair companies to use the binding arbitration process. But the opinion, written by Justice Antonin Scalia firmly rejected that argument. Scalia wrote, "At the time of the CROA’s enactment in 1996, arbitration clauses such as the one at issue were no rarity in consumer contracts generally, or in financial services contracts in particular. Had Congress meant to prohibit these very common provisions in the CROA, it would have done so in a manner less obtuse than what respondents suggest."

The case reversed a ruling by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

The ruling is problematic for consumers because binding arbitration is usually results in a verdict in favor of the business. The reason for this is the system used to choose an arbitrator.

Any arbitrator has to be acceptable to both parties and is supposed to be impartial. But businesses will normally refuse to approve any arbitrator who is known to hand down ruling favoring consumers. Arbitrators know this and, since their income is dependent upon their ability to work on future disputes, the deck is stacked against consumers IMHO.

Note: When posting a comment, please sign-in first if you want a response. If you are not registered, click here. Registration is easy and free.

Follow me on Twitter:

 

TwitterCounter for @jmalmberg

 

 

 

Follow ACCESS

Comments
Search
Charles R. Williams  - credit repair companies     |From:49.145.90.xxx |2012-02-22 02:26:18
nice blog. all the information needed by a debtor are all found in this great article. the ways to improve credit score mentioned above can really help debtors like me.
jmalmberg  - RE: credit repair companies     |2012-02-22 10:21:58
We're glad that you like the site. If you find the information here helpful, please consider donating so that we can continue to help consumers. All donations are tax deductible.
Only registered users can write comments!

3.25 Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 
Guard My Credit Polls
#1 - Why did you visit our site today?
 
.•*´¯☼ ♥ ♥ Your Support of These Links Is GREATLY Appreciated ♥ ♥ ☼¯´*•.
Advertisement
 
Go to top of page
Home | Contact Us |About Us | Privacy Policy
eXTReMe Tracker
11/21/2024 05:19:28