Home arrow Credit Issues arrow In The News arrow US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Revives Fair Credit Reporting Act Lawsuit
User Login





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Guard My Credit Menu
Home
- - - THE ISSUES - - -
Videos
Fraud and Scams
Credit Issues
Identity Theft
Privacy Issues
Our Children
Politics & Politicians
- - ACTION CENTER - -
Guard My Credit Links
Helpful Pamphlets
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
About ACCESS
Contact Us
About Our Site
Join the Fight
ACCESS is a non-profit, tax exempt consumer advocacy group.

Donations are tax deductable.

Guard My Credit Hits
11412491 Visitors
US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Revives Fair Credit Reporting Act Lawsuit PDF Print E-mail

August 15, 2017 - The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has revived a lawsuit against Spokeo for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Spokeo functions as a data aggregator; buying data from various sources and then assembling it into consumer files that can be purchased by businesses and individuals alike. The plaintiff in the case - Thomas Robins - claimed that the company violated the FCRA by assembling and reselling a file on him that contained a wide variety of inaccurate information. Robins sued for $1,000 - the maximum amount available under the FCRA - but also tried to have the case turned into a class action suit which could potentially leave the company on the hook for billions of dollars.

Image Image

Last May, the Supreme Court reversed a prior 9th Circuit decision favoring Robins and sent the case back down to the appellate level. The justices asked the lower court to determine if Robins had actually been damaged by Spokeo's inaccurate reporting. The new decision says that he was.

Robins' Spokeo file said that he was over 50 years old, had children, was married, had an advanced degree and was employed. According to Robins, all of those things were inaccurate.

In the Supreme Court's review, justices stated that not all inaccuracies cause harm. But in the 9th Circuit's most recent review, Judge Diarmuid O'Scannlain wrote that it didn't take "much imagination" to see how someone could be hurt by an inaccurate consumer report. Spokeo sells their reports to prospective employers but also to individuals who want background checks done before they go on a date. Given the extent of inaccurate data that was apparently included in Robin's file, he could easily have had issues on both fronts.

O'Scannlain further wrote for the three judge panel that the errors claimed by Robins "do not strike us as the sort of mere technical violations which are too insignificant to present a sincere risk of harm to the real-world interests that Congress chose to protect with FCRA."

Should Robins win his case the decision is likely to be appealed to the Supreme Court once again. Spokeo is far from the only company selling consumer reports and a decision in Robins favor could potentially cost firms billions of dollars. That fact alone guarantees a fight.

byJim Malmberg

Note: When posting a comment, please sign-in first if you want a response. If you are not registered, click here. Registration is easy and free.

Follow me on Twitter:

Twitter Counter for @OldAbeWhipple

 

Follow ACCESS
 
Comments
Search
Only registered users can write comments!

3.25 Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 
Guard My Credit Polls
#1 - Why did you visit our site today?
 
.•*´¯☼ ♥ ♥ Your Support of These Links Is GREATLY Appreciated ♥ ♥ ☼¯´*•.
Advertisement
 
Go to top of page
Home | Contact Us |About Us | Privacy Policy
eXTReMe Tracker
11/21/2024 05:01:21