Home arrow Identity Theft arrow In The News arrow Court Ruling Allows Data Breach Suit Against Neiman Marcus to Move Forward
User Login





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Guard My Credit Menu
Home
- - - THE ISSUES - - -
Videos
Fraud and Scams
Credit Issues
Identity Theft
Privacy Issues
Our Children
Politics & Politicians
- - ACTION CENTER - -
Guard My Credit Links
Helpful Pamphlets
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
About ACCESS
Contact Us
About Our Site
Join the Fight
ACCESS is a non-profit, tax exempt consumer advocacy group.

Donations are tax deductable.

Guard My Credit Hits
11452054 Visitors
Court Ruling Allows Data Breach Suit Against Neiman Marcus to Move Forward PDF Print E-mail

July 31, 2015 – The US Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has reversed a lower court ruling and given “standing” to vicitims of Nieman Marcus’ data breach. The ruling is important because the lower court had ruled that simply having your data exposed in a data breach was not an injury in the court’s eyes. Therefore, before you could sue for having your data exposed, you had to prove that you had suffered an actual financial loss. Moreover, you had to be able to show that the loss you suffered was as a direct result of the data breach; a standard that was almost impossible to reach.

Image

The class action suit alleges that the plaintiffs in the case have sustained an injury even if they have not sustained any financial damages yet. Part of that injury is an increased risk of fraud and identity theft. The court agreed. In a written rulling the court said, “the Neiman Marcus customers should not have to wait until hackers commit identity theft or credit-card fraud in order to give the class standing, because there is an ‘objective reasonable likelihood’ that such an injury will occur.”

The rulling also stated that the presumed purpose of hacking Neiman Marcus’ computer system and stealing customer data was to commit fraud; whether immediate or at a later date. It went on to state that because of the breach, the plaintiffs had been forced to take steps to protect their identities and their credit and that the costs associated with these efforts were an actual financial injury, giving them standing to file suit.

The ruling is important because it will likely influence rulings in similar cases in other federal circuits. It is also a shot across the bow of companies that maintain large online databases of consumer information. It means that these companies won’t be able to claim that their customers haven’t been hurt by data breaches if they haven’t suffered a financial loss. 

byJim Malmberg

Note: When posting a comment, please sign-in first if you want a response. If you are not registered, click here. Registration is easy and free.

Follow me on Twitter:

Jim Malmberg has 8112 followers on Twitter
Follow ACCESS
Comments
Search
Only registered users can write comments!

3.25 Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 
Guard My Credit Polls
Poll #166 - Have you personnally been a victim of Identity Theft
 
#1 - Why did you visit our site today?
 
.•*´¯☼ ♥ ♥ Your Support of These Links Is GREATLY Appreciated ♥ ♥ ☼¯´*•.
Advertisement
 
Go to top of page
Home | Contact Us |About Us | Privacy Policy
eXTReMe Tracker
12/22/2024 11:20:44